Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) took effect June 30, 2020, and applies to recommendations made by broker-dealers to retail customers — natural persons receiving recommendations for personal, family, or household purposes. Reg BI imposes four obligations: (1) Disclosure Obligation — deliver Form CRS (Client Relationship Summary) to retail customers before or at the time of a recommendation, summarizing the relationship, fees, conflicts of interest, and disciplinary history; (2) Care Obligation — exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill; act in the customer's best interest; consider the customer's investment profile, and consider the costs and reasonably available alternatives; (3) Conflict of Interest Obligation — establish and enforce policies to identify, disclose, and mitigate or eliminate conflicts of interest (e.g., proprietary products, revenue sharing, compensation structures); (4) Compliance Obligation — establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures to achieve compliance with Reg BI.
The care obligation under Reg BI is meaningfully higher than suitability. Under suitability, a broker could recommend any suitable product even if a better (lower-cost, more appropriate) alternative existed. Under Reg BI, the broker must consider "reasonably available alternatives" — a higher cost product needs justification if cheaper alternatives are suitable. Cost is not the only factor, but it must be considered.
The suitability analysis — whether under Rule 2111 or Reg BI — centers on the customer's investment profile: age, other investments (existing holdings), financial situation (income, net worth, tax status), investment objectives, investment experience, investment time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and any other information the customer discloses. These factors do not operate in isolation. A recommendation of speculative options trading might be suitable for a high-net-worth, experienced investor with a stated speculative objective but completely unsuitable for a retiree with the same objective if they cannot afford losses.
Know Your Customer (KYC) is an ongoing obligation, not merely a one-time exercise at account opening. When a customer's circumstances change — they retire, get divorced, inherit money, or experience a health crisis — the representative must update the profile and reassess whether existing holdings and future recommendations remain appropriate. FINRA has sanctioned representatives for failing to update customer information and continuing to make recommendations based on stale profiles.
Key Terms:
Quiz Questions:
Q1. A registered representative recommends a high-yield bond fund to a 72-year-old widow whose stated objective is capital preservation and who cannot afford losses. The representative's primary violation is:
A) Reasonable basis suitability — the product is unsuitable for all investors B) Customer-specific suitability — the product is unsuitable for this particular customer C) Quantitative suitability — excessive trading has occurred D) No violation because high-yield bonds are registered securities
Answer: B — Customer-specific suitability. High-yield bond funds are suitable for some investors (those with risk tolerance and income objectives), but this specific customer's capital preservation objective and inability to afford losses make the recommendation unsuitable for her. This is a customer-specific failure. Quantitative suitability (C) addresses excessive trading frequency, not a single bad recommendation.
---
Q2. Under Regulation Best Interest, when must a broker-dealer deliver Form CRS to a new retail customer?
A) Within 30 days of the first trade B) Annually thereafter once the account is opened C) Before or at the time of the first recommendation D) Only upon the customer's written request
Answer: C — Form CRS must be delivered before or at the time of the first recommendation to a retail customer. This is the Disclosure Obligation under Reg BI. Annual delivery (B) is not required for Form CRS (though other annual communications may be required). Waiting 30 days (A) or requiring customer request (D) would violate the timing requirement.
---
Q3. A broker recommends a mutual fund with a 5.75% front-end sales load when a nearly identical no-load index fund is available at the same firm. The retail customer asked for a low-cost growth fund. Under Reg BI, this recommendation most likely violates which obligation?
A) Disclosure Obligation B) Compliance Obligation C) Care Obligation D) No obligation is violated if the loaded fund is otherwise suitable
Answer: C — The Care Obligation requires the broker to act in the retail customer's best interest and to consider costs and reasonably available alternatives. When a lower-cost, nearly identical alternative is available, recommending the higher-cost product without justification likely fails the care obligation. Under old suitability (D), this might have been acceptable — the loaded fund was technically suitable — but Reg BI sets a higher standard.
---
Q4. Which of the following factors is part of a customer's investment profile for suitability purposes?
A) The representative's commission schedule B) The customer's liquidity needs, time horizon, and risk tolerance C) The broker-dealer's annual revenue targets D) Whether the product was approved by the firm's compliance department
Answer: B — A customer's investment profile includes age, financial situation, tax status, investment objectives, time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, other investments, and investment experience. The representative's compensation (A), the firm's revenue goals (C), and compliance approval status (D) are firm-side considerations, not customer profile factors.
---
Q5. A customer has been day-trading actively in his retirement account. Over six months, the representative has made 200 trades, generating $15,000 in commissions on a $60,000 account. No single trade was unsuitable in isolation. The representative may be in violation of:
A) FINRA Rule 2111 quantitative suitability for excessive trading (churning) B) Reg BI Care Obligation only, since the account is a retirement account C) No rule, since each individual trade was suitable D) FINRA Rule 4512 for failure to update account records
Answer: A — Quantitative suitability (churning) is violated when trading is excessive relative to the customer's resources and objectives, even if each individual trade was suitable. $15,000 in commissions on a $60,000 account over six months represents a 25% commission-to-equity ratio, which courts and FINRA have found to be strong evidence of churning. The fact that each trade was individually suitable (C) is not a defense to churning.
---