Ethics & Professional Standards·Gips Reporting

Section: GIPS Reporting in Practice

Estimated study time: 45 minutes

Content:

GIPS reporting is the formal process by which investment management firms present composite performance to prospective and existing clients. Understanding GIPS at Level 3 requires going beyond the rules covered in the Ethics section and applying them to realistic reporting scenarios — distinguishing required from recommended elements, identifying errors in sample presentations, and understanding the interaction between GIPS and the broader performance evaluation framework.

A GIPS-compliant composite presentation must include a minimum of five years of annual performance history, building to ten years as the composite ages. For composites with less than five years of history, all available history since inception must be presented. Returns must be presented for each annual period — monthly returns are not required. Any period less than one year (e.g., a composite created six months ago) must present returns since inception and must not annualize those returns.

Required disclosures that are frequently tested include: (1) a statement that the firm claims compliance with GIPS (must appear in every compliant presentation); (2) the composite creation date (when the composite was first created by the firm); (3) the definition of "firm" as used in the composite; (4) the composite description and strategy; (5) the benchmark used and a reason if no benchmark is shown; (6) the currency used; (7) gross-of-fees or net-of-fees returns (both must be disclosed for the same period); (8) the composite's internal dispersion measure (for periods with five or more portfolios); (9) the number of portfolios in the composite; and (10) composite assets as a percentage of total firm assets.

Recommended disclosures (not required) include: presenting both gross and net of fees side by side; presenting performance for periods longer than ten years; providing leverage and derivatives information; providing information on the use of subadvisors. A presentation that includes only net-of-fees returns (without disclosing that gross-of-fees returns are available on request) may still comply with GIPS as long as all required disclosures are present.

Internal dispersion measures the spread of individual portfolio returns within the composite for a given period — it shows whether all portfolios in the composite earned similar returns or if dispersion was wide. Common dispersion measures include the asset-weighted standard deviation of portfolio returns and the high-low range. Dispersion is only required when the composite has five or more portfolios for the full year. Wide dispersion may indicate that the composite definition is too broad, including portfolios with meaningfully different mandates.

Key Terms:

  • Composite presentation: The formal GIPS document presenting a composite's performance history to prospective or existing clients.
  • Required disclosure: An element that must appear in every GIPS-compliant presentation; omission violates GIPS.
  • Recommended disclosure: An element GIPS suggests including but does not require; omission does not violate compliance.
  • Composite creation date: The date the composite was established by the firm — must be disclosed; separate from inception of the composite's performance history.
  • Internal dispersion: Spread of individual portfolio returns within a composite for the period; required when composite has 5+ portfolios.
  • Asset-weighted standard deviation: A dispersion measure weighting each portfolio's return by its relative size in the composite.
  • Three-year annualized standard deviation: Measure of composite volatility required since 2011; both the composite's and the benchmark's must be shown.
  • Gross-of-fees return: Investment return before deducting investment management fees; net-of-fees is after management fees.

Quiz Questions:

Q1. A composite was created by a firm in January 2024. The firm claims GIPS compliance and is preparing its first annual composite presentation for year-end 2024. The presentation must include:

A) Ten years of annual returns, showing the composite at zero for years before its creation B) Five years of annual returns built up from the composite creation date C) Annual returns since inception (one year, January 2024 – December 2024) D) No returns yet — GIPS requires five years before any presentation can be made

Answer: C — A new composite presents returns since inception. It does not need five years before it can be presented — it shows what is available. It must NOT annualize returns for periods less than one year, but a full calendar year is permissible to present. The composite builds toward ten years over time.

---

Q2. A GIPS-compliant presentation shows only net-of-fees returns for all periods. A prospective client asks whether gross-of-fees returns are available. Under GIPS, the firm:

A) Must immediately amend the presentation to include gross returns before responding B) Must provide gross-of-fees returns for all periods — showing only net-of-fees is a GIPS violation C) May present either gross or net-of-fees (or both) — showing only net is permissible as long as required disclosures state that returns are net and management fees are disclosed D) Is prohibited from showing gross-of-fees returns to prospective clients

Answer: C — GIPS does not require gross-of-fees returns — it requires disclosure of which type of return is being presented and requires disclosure of the management fee schedule. Presenting only net-of-fees, with appropriate disclosure, complies with GIPS. Showing both gross and net is recommended, not required.

---

Q3. Under GIPS, internal dispersion is required in the composite presentation when:

A) The composite has been in existence for more than five years B) The composite includes portfolios from different asset classes C) The composite has five or more portfolios for the full annual period D) The composite's returns deviate from the benchmark by more than 2%

Answer: C — Internal dispersion is required when the composite had five or more portfolios for the full annual period. The purpose is to show whether portfolio returns within the composite were consistent. If the composite had fewer than five full-period portfolios, dispersion disclosure is not required (though it may be disclosed voluntarily).

---

Q4. A firm presents a GIPS-compliant composite. The presentation shows the 3-year annualized standard deviation of the composite (12.5%) but omits the benchmark's 3-year annualized standard deviation. Under GIPS, this:

A) Is permissible, because benchmark risk statistics are recommended but not required B) Is a violation, because the three-year annualized standard deviation must be shown for both the composite and benchmark C) Is permissible if the firm discloses why no benchmark is shown D) Requires a footnote, but the omission is not a violation

Answer: B — Since January 1, 2011, GIPS requires that the three-year annualized standard deviation be presented for both the composite AND the benchmark for all annual periods ending after January 1, 2011. Showing only the composite's standard deviation and omitting the benchmark's is a violation.

---

Q5. A GIPS composite includes 25 portfolios. For the most recent annual period, internal dispersion (measured as the asset-weighted standard deviation of portfolio returns) is 6.5%. The composite return is 9.2% and the benchmark return is 8.8%. What does the high internal dispersion most likely indicate?

A) The composite is performing well above benchmark, justifying high fees B) The 6.5% dispersion is acceptable for all active equity composites C) The composite may include portfolios with meaningfully different mandates, risk profiles, or constraints — the composite definition may need to be reviewed D) The composite has too many portfolios; GIPS limits composites to 10 portfolios

Answer: C — High internal dispersion within a composite (6.5% when the composite return was only 9.2%) suggests the portfolios in the composite are not managed similarly enough to belong together. This could mean the composite definition is too broad, or that some portfolios have constraints (cash reserves, concentrated positions, tax constraints) that significantly differ from others. GIPS requires composites to group similarly managed portfolios — wide dispersion is a warning signal.

---