Fair housing law prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on protected characteristics. California has one of the broadest fair housing frameworks in the nation, combining federal protections with significantly expanded state law. California brokers must know both layers — federal and state — and understand the practical implications for every real estate transaction.
---
The Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968), as amended in 1988, prohibits discrimination in residential real estate transactions based on seven protected classes:
1. Race 2. Color 3. National Origin 4. Religion 5. Sex (includes sexual harassment under HUD interpretations) 6. Disability (physical or mental) 7. Familial Status (families with children under 18, pregnant women, persons in the process of securing custody of children)
These seven classes are protected in all residential transactions — sales, rentals, financing, and advertising — nationwide.
---
California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code §12955 et seq.) extends fair housing protections significantly beyond the federal baseline. California adds the following protected classes:
8. Source of Income (includes Housing Choice Vouchers / Section 8, SSI, disability payments, spousal support — landlords cannot refuse to rent to tenants based on how their income is derived) 9. Sexual Orientation (gay, lesbian, bisexual) 10. Gender Identity (transgender status) 11. Gender Expression (non-conforming gender presentation) 12. Marital Status 13. Age (40 and older — applies primarily in employment but extends to housing in certain contexts) 14. Medical Condition (cancer or genetic characteristics) 15. Genetic Information 16. Military or Veteran Status 17. Ancestry (distinct from national origin — covers ethnic subgroups) 18. Immigration Status (cannot use undocumented status to discriminate in rental housing)
Total California protected classes: approximately 15–18, compared to 7 under federal law.
---
The following practices are prohibited under fair housing law regardless of intent:
---
The Fair Housing Act imposes specific obligations on landlords regarding tenants with disabilities:
"Reasonable" means the accommodation does not impose an undue burden on the landlord. Landlords can request documentation (from a healthcare provider) for non-obvious disabilities.
In federally subsidized housing, the landlord may bear the cost of modifications. In private housing, the tenant pays. The landlord can require the tenant to restore the unit to its original condition upon move-out (if restoration is reasonable).
---
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination against families with children under 18. Practical implications:
---
Source of income is a California-specific protected class that federal law does not require. Under FEHA:
---
California's Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code §51) provides that all persons are entitled to full and equal accommodations in all business establishments in California, regardless of:
The Unruh Act:
---
Fair housing testing involves sending paired testers (matched for everything except the protected characteristic) to evaluate how a landlord or agent responds:
Enforcement channels: 1. HUD complaint: File within 1 year of the discriminatory act; HUD investigates and may pursue a hearing 2. Civil lawsuit: Plaintiff can sue in federal court within 2 years; remedies include actual damages, punitive damages (no cap in federal Fair Housing cases), and attorney's fees 3. DOJ: Department of Justice can bring suit in patterns of discrimination or public interest cases 4. California DFEH (now CRD): State civil rights enforcement agency; can investigate and pursue cases under FEHA 5. DRE complaint: Against licensees for fair housing violations — subject to license discipline
---
The federal Fair Housing Act has limited exemptions:
Note: California's FEHA has narrower exemptions — the owner-occupied small building exemption applies only to buildings with 1 unit other than the owner's unit. California law is stricter.
---
| Enforcement Path | Damages | |---|---| | HUD administrative hearing | Up to $16,000 (first offense), up to $65,000 (third offense within 7 years) | | Federal civil lawsuit | Actual damages + unlimited punitive damages + attorney's fees | | California FEHA civil action | Actual damages + punitive damages + attorney's fees | | Unruh Act | $4,000 minimum per violation + actual damages + attorney's fees | | DRE discipline | License suspension or revocation |
---
---
Quiz Questions:
Q1. A California landlord advertises an apartment as "perfect for a Christian family." Under the Fair Housing Act and FEHA, this advertisement:
A) Is permissible — freedom of religion protects the landlord's right to express religious preferences B) Violates the Fair Housing Act's prohibition on discriminatory advertising based on religion C) Is permissible if the building is owner-occupied with fewer than 4 units D) Is only actionable if the landlord actually rejects an applicant based on religion
Answer: B — Discriminatory advertising — expressing a preference for any protected class including religion — violates the Fair Housing Act. No actual rejection is needed. The advertisement itself is the violation.
---
Q2. A tenant with a documented physical disability asks her landlord for permission to install grab bars in the bathroom to prevent falls. The landlord refuses, saying the lease prohibits modifications. Under the Fair Housing Act, the landlord:
A) Has the right to refuse — the lease controls B) Must permit the reasonable modification at the tenant's expense; prohibiting a modification needed for disability accommodation violates the FHA C) Must pay for the modification because the tenant has a disability D) Can require the tenant to post a bond but cannot refuse the modification
Answer: B — The Fair Housing Act requires landlords to allow reasonable physical modifications to accommodate a tenant's disability, at the tenant's expense. Refusing this request violates the FHA.
---
Q3. A California landlord refuses to accept a prospective tenant because the tenant plans to pay rent using a Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8). Under California law:
A) This is permissible — the landlord has the right to choose tenants based on payment method B) This is a violation of FEHA — source of income (including Section 8 vouchers) is a protected class in California C) This is permissible in California as long as federal fair housing rules are followed D) This is only illegal if the landlord advertised "Section 8 welcome"
Answer: B — Source of income is a California protected class under FEHA. Refusing to accept Housing Choice Vouchers is a form of source-of-income discrimination that violates California law.
---
Q4. A real estate broker tells a white couple considering buying a home in a mixed-race neighborhood: "The neighborhood used to be great, but it's really changing — you might want to look at other areas." This statement is an example of:
A) Good fiduciary advice — the broker is protecting the buyers' interests B) Steering — directing buyers away from a neighborhood based on its racial composition C) Blockbusting — inducing a sale by reference to changing neighborhood demographics D) Redlining — refusing financial services based on neighborhood composition
Answer: B — The broker is steering — directing buyers away from a neighborhood by referencing its racial composition ("changing"). This is a classic steering scenario. Blockbusting specifically involves inducing SELLERS to sell based on racial transition fears; steering involves guiding BUYERS or RENTERS based on neighborhood demographics.
---
Q5. A senior housing community advertises that at least 80% of its units are occupied by residents aged 55 or older and follows HUD-required policies demonstrating its senior housing intent. A family with a 3-year-old child applies and is rejected. Under the Fair Housing Act:
A) The rejection violates the familial status protection B) The community qualifies for the 55+ senior housing exemption and may lawfully reject the application C) The community can only reject if 100% of residents are 55+ D) Senior housing exemptions apply only to communities built before 1988
Answer: B — A community that meets the 55+ senior housing exemption requirements (80% of units occupied by at least one person 55+, plus published policies and HUD registration) is lawfully exempt from the familial status prohibition. The rejection of a family with a young child is permissible.